Abstract
In India, loss of fertility through soil erosion is primarily a summer monsoons mediated phenomenon. Reversing the land degradation processes contribute to water availability, soil fertility maintenance, adapting to climate change and overall food security. Whereas kharif (monsoon/rainy season crop) foodgrain production largely depends on summer monsoons, the rabi season (post-rainy season/winter crop) rainfall is too little to exert a direct influence. In spite of larger acreage under kharif foodgrain crops, total fertiliser consumption during kharif and rabi seasons is comparable. Negative rainfall anomalies (deficit) adversely affected total fertiliser consumption and their use efficiency. Despite significant differences in fertiliser application rates, the response to applied fertiliser nutrients is almost similar in the two seasons. This implies that nutrient use efficiency (NUE) has a manageable and an unmanageable component wherein 4R practices are difficult to implement under unfavourable kharif weather conditions. Partial factor productivity of fertilizer nutrients (PFPF) has continuously declined over decades mainly because of depletion of soil organic carbon, imbalanced use of nutrients and inability to maintain soil moisture supplies. These observations plus yield-gap analysis permitted us to conclude that past trends of declining NUE can only be reversed through a shift either in sustainable land management practices or enhancing the genetic yield potential/ biomass of crop cultivars or by combining both and making kharif crop planting independent of monsoons rains through direct dry seeding.
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2021
Gupta Raj, et al.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
For continued cultivation, adequate replenishment of nutrients is essential to avoid soil fertility depletions. In India, before independence, application of bulky organic manures and green manuring were the principal ways to maintain adequate soil fertility levels. In the transition period, farmers adopted integrated use of organics with some chemical fertilisers. Over the last four decades, Indian farmers have largely replaced organic manures with chemical fertilizers to improve soil fertility and land productivity. Most farmers have even discontinued the practices of green manuring and retaining or incorporating crop residues into soil. In the entire post-independence era, there has been a tendency to equate the use of organics only in terms of its nitrogen supplying capacity and meeting the loss of other nutrients. On this account, the role of organic matter in soils has largely remained unappreciated and such a narrow view on the role of organic matter has contributed to a fatigue in Indian agriculture. Ideally, the fertilizer research should aim to integrate and address the broader role of soil organic matter (SOM) in terms of (i) nutrient and water regulation, (ii) biological activity (iii) carbon sequestration, (iv) rainwater conservation coupled with Although extensive use of chemical fertilizers in both rainfed and irrigated agriculture was set an early goal for enhancing agricultural production in the country, yet fertiliser consumption is not looking up In India, 72.4 and 54.2 million hectare (Mha) were devoted to food crops during kharif and rabi season, respectively in 2010-11. From a total area of 126.6 Mha, India annually produces about 281 million tonnes (MT) of food grains. Besides this, nearly 25.6 million hectares were devoted to horticultural crops in 2018-19 to produce 314.87 MT of fruits and vegetables. Compared with base year 1969-70, the current food and horticultural production has increased by about half a dozen folds. Much of the primary driving force contributing to agricultural growth during the aforesaid period relates to availability of modern higher yielding cultivars, expansion of irrigation, and increased use of fertilizer nutrients and agrochemicals, energy and agricultural machinery for timely completion of the farm operations ‡ Milesi et al. It has been reported that deficit rainfall impacts food production more than the excess of it Land degradation is a complex and an insidious phenomenon which begins to become obvious through (i) reduced crop yields despite usual application of inputs, (ii) increased runoff and soil erosion leading to declining soil fertility, (iii) reduced biomass production resulting from soil moisture shortages and C sequestration, (iv) reduced capacity of soils to moderate soil temperature, (v) declining water table, (vi) appearance of surface salt encrustations in high water areas, and (vii) surface sealing and temporary ponding after a rainfall event. In India, land degradation manifests itself through one or more of above mentioned symptomatic processes In the semi-arid tropics, there appears a clear relationship among (a) adverse conditions in terms of available surface and ground water resources, (b) erratic rainfall leading to runoff and loss of top soil, (c) global warming and high potential evapotranspiration, (d) declining organic carbon contents and poor nutrient status of soils. The extent to which crop yields are limited in the tropics, depend on water and nutrients supplies. Response to fertilizer application is governed by the available soil moisture supplies. If there is not enough moisture in the soil to support plant growth, the increased input of external fertiliser nutrients is generally unwarranted. Soil moisture at wheat seeding alone accounts for 50% variation in crop yield Source: Cassman et al. Nutrients and water are the building blocks for plant biomass production through photosynthetic process. Presently, India is the world’s third largest producer and user of fertilizer nutrients. Randhawa and Tandon Therefore, PFPF expression is an aggregate efficiency index of nutrients and includes contributions to crop yield from (i) uptake of soil nutrients, (ii) fertilizer nutrient uptake, and (iii) the efficiency with which nutrients acquired by the plant are converted to grain yield. Thus, PFPF is impacted, amongst other factors, by fertilizer management practices. For instance, the PFP for nitrogen (PFPN ) can be represented as (Eq. 1): PFPN = (Y0 + ∆YF)/NF(1) In the above expression, yield at a given fertilizer N level (NF), represents the sum of yield without fertilizer N0 (Y0) plus the incremental yield gains due to fertilizer application (∆YF). The expression can be rewritten as (Eq. 2): PFPN= Y0/NF + ∆YF/NF (2) Where ∆YF/NF equals agronomic efficiency (AE) which is a product of RE and PE (or AE= RE*PE) in agronomic parlance. Therefore, PFPN = Y0/NF + RE*PE. Since soils have an inherent capacity to supply nitrogen (NS), the total supply of N from the soil and applied through fertiliser equals (Ns+NF) and the term, Y0/NF= Y0/( Ns+Nf). Equation (2) can therefore, be written as (Eq. 3): PFPN= Y0/ (NS+ NF)+∆YF/NF (3) From the term Y0/ (NS+ NF), it occurs that Y0 depends on the physico-chemical and biological properties of the soils and the soil management factors determining the availability of nutrients including N in soil. A soil rich in organic carbon invariably will have more biotic activity, greater nutrient availability and better health. Fertilizer N application rates (NF) in expression Y0/(NS+ NF) influence both NS and Y0. Fertilizer N promotes plant growth and adds to SOM or builds-up residual N in soil to promote microbial activitycompared with a soil receiving no fertilizer. The net effect of application rates is linked to yield optima- lower levels build-up SOM and microbial biomass by promoting plant growth. Higher N application rates increase residual inorganic N to accelerate SOM losses through microbial actions Global and Indian estimates of nitrogen use efficiency for cereals (maize, rice and wheat) indicate that it decreased with enhanced application rate and was lower in the Indian context than the global values ( Units for different parameters: ɸkg N ha-1; Ωkg grain·kg nutrient–1 applied; ‡(%); ¥kg grain·(kg nutrient)–1 absorbed by the crop. Sources: Global estimates from Ladha et al. NPK fertilizer consumption in India has increased by a dozen times since 1969-70. Fertilizer consumption (28.122 MT) was highest in the year 2010-11, hovering around 25 MT between 2012 and 2017. In 2018-19, NPK consumption was 27.29 MT for all crops including the horticultural crops. Conservative estimates suggest that about 6% of the total NPKfertilizers are used in Indian horticulture sector In order to visualize the effect of monsoon uncertainty on NUE, a relationship between fertilizer consumption during the kharif season and rainfall deviations from long term means was computed using available dataset of All India Summer Monsoon Rainfall index anomalies Maximum yield (under rainfed conditions) or potential yield (irrigated) at a given location is generally determined by solar radiation, temperature, and nutrient and water supplies to the crops. All these factors vary throughout the year, and therefore yield potential will depend not only on location but also on the crop-sowing and maturity dates.Half of the total yield gaps in rice-wheat systems of India have been attributed It is a common knowledge that yield increases are not linear with increase in single factor such as nitrogen. Mitscherlich It must be mentioned here that at low yield levels, crop cover will be less due to poor crop growth resulting from nutrient shortage. Reduced surface cover due to less vigorous crop growth results in decreased protection of soil from rainfall mediated soil erosion processes. On the upper end of the response curve, yields continue to improve, The performance of agriculture in the country can also be evaluated following the yield gap concept Decreasing productivity of the added nitrogen reflects loss in soil carbon and soil life disrupting paradigm of mechanical tillage which debilitates many important soil-mediated ecofunctions 1=Water infiltration, water percolation and moisture storage/ aquifer recharge, improves irrigation water application and use; 2= Stable and varied porosity; 3= Favors biological soil-layering;4=Buffers raindrop impact and diurnal temperature fluctuations in root zone; 5=Prevents soil-crusting and cracking; 6=Provide energy and nutrients for biota; 7= Augment channels and opens deep into soils; 8= enhance biodiversity in soils; 9=Beneficial root exudates promote biotic activity; 10= Favors development of optimum soil architecture (solids x spaces);11= Add N rich biomass; 12= Nitrogen fixation and nutrient mobilization; 13= Provide surface cover before rains and SWC. (Source: Adapted from Kassam). The low NUE observed for Indian agriculture systems appears to be related with excess dependence of farmers on synthetic fertilizers with little focus on N inputs derived from symbiotic N2 fixation or other organic sources. When a significant proportion of the total arable lands in India are continuously devoted to production of rice, wheat, maize and sugarcane crops, the NUE is expected to be low. The logic warrants that area under cereal system must be reduced along with a paradigm shift in the way agriculture is currently practiced in the country. Ghosh Government of India has taken several measures towards sustainable agriculture by giving greater importance to organic farming which promotes the use of organic manures and bio-fertilizers in agriculture. Reducing our dependence on the use of chemical fertilizers calls for (i) incorporating legumes in the cropping systems, (ii) promoting conjunctive use of organic and inorganic fertilizers (iii) relying on nutrient recycling through adoption of crops having different rooting systems, (iv) promoting beneficial symbiotic microbial associations, (v) deploying in-situ / ex-situ composting techniques to improve soil biotic activity, (vi) increasing biological N2 fixation, (vii) green manuring, (viii) employing microbial inoculants to improve nutrient access in soils (arbuscular mycorrhiza and P solubilizing bacteria), (ix) using efficient fermented microbial formulations which are highly compatible with bio-enhancers which promote plant growth, yields, and healthy agro-ecosystems, and (x) promoting rational use of nutrients in cropping systems. The other strategy requires promoting the adoption of production management systems (soil, water, crop and land management) that improve resource use efficiency and build c carbon. The innovative production management systems should consider (i) tillage practices that reduce the rate of SOM decomposition, runoff and soil erosion, conserve soil moisture etc. to improve soil health (ii) inclusion of high biomass producing crops in cropping systems (iii) residue retention and recycling (iv) use of manures, (v) switch from monoculture to rotation cropping, (vi) annual to perennial crops, (vii) adoption of agroforestry systems and (viii) avoiding sudden land use change Globally, researchers seem to be in general agreement that inclusion of M3 research namely, soil Organic Matter, soil Microbes and soil Moisture retention, is critical in arresting and reversing soil degradation processes. M3soil attributes enhance soil productivity, improve nutrient and water use efficiency, reduce production costs and significantly benefit the environment. There is an urgent need to move away from the traditional tilled agriculture (having many conflicting and unsustainable practices) to CA production management system. Conservation agriculture has the targeted effect in reducing the use of synthetic fertilizers through slowed SOM decomposition, reduced soil erosion during rainy season through residue retention and brown manuring (green manure crop knocked down through herbicide to provide surface mulch) and avoidance of summer deep plowing. Conservation agriculture is more carbon efficient and sequesters more organic carbon which is central to continued delivery of soil eco-functions
Crop season
‡Growth Rates (MT Yr-1) during the periods
Growth Rates during the periods (Present study)
1966-1990
1991-2006
1967-1991
1992-2007
2007-2016
Kharif
1.61
0.70
1.68
0.66
0.83
Rabi
1.97
0.40Ω
1.56
1.63
1.70
2.7*-3.0£
1.2
1.8
Crop
Region
Number of farms studied
Average N rate (kg ha-1)
N Recovery*(%)
Maize
North Central USA
56
103
37
Rice
Asian farmer practice
179
117
31
Rice
Asia- field specific management
179
112
40
Wheat
India- unfavourable weather
23
145
18
Wheat
India- favourable weather
21
123
49
Crop
Estimate
N rateɸ
AEΩ
PFPfΩ
RE‡
PE¥
Maize
Global
123
24.2
72
65
36.7
Rice
Global
115
22.0
62.4
46
52.8
Rice
Indian
61-120
16.2
47.7
40.2
37.7
Wheat
Indian
121-180
13.1
37.8
31.3
40.4
Wheat
Global
112
18.1
44.5
57.0
28.9
Wheat
Indian
40-60
28.8
83.7
73.8
47.8
Wheat
Indian
61-120
20.1
50.2
57.7
42.8
Wheat
Indian
121-180
15.9
31.3
61.8
24.0
Components of soils’ productive capacity
Resource Conserving Practices of CA
No-Till/Leveling
Mulching/ surface cover
Rotations/Dry Seeding
Legumes
Physical
2
5
7
10
Chemical
-
-
9
12
Biological
3
6
8
11
Hydrological
1
4
13
-