Editor Resources
Tools and guidance to support editorial excellence.
Editorial Resources for JDT
Editors receive structured resources to ensure consistent decision making.
Guidance focuses on clinical rigor and transparent reporting.
Decision ToolsTemplates for clear editorial feedback.
Ethics SupportIntegrity guidance and escalation.
Reviewer MatchingTools to identify expert reviewers.
Ongoing TrainingUpdates on reporting standards.
Journal at a glance: ISSN 2476-1710 | DOI Prefix 10.14302/issn.2476-1710 | License CC BY 4.0 | Peer reviewed, open access journal.
Editorial Resources
- Reviewer selection guidelines and expertise matching
- Decision templates and communication tools
- Ethics escalation workflows
- Reporting standard checklists for depression studies
- Production and copyediting contacts
Support Channels
- Editorial office support via [email protected]
- Updates on policy changes and best practices
- Training resources for new editors
- Access to reviewer performance tracking
Editorial Quality Checklist
Editors use consistent criteria to maintain rigor and fairness.
- Confirm scope alignment before review assignment
- Select reviewers with relevant clinical expertise
- Check for conflicts of interest early
- Ensure ethical approvals are documented
- Provide clear decision rationale for authors
- Track reviewer timelines and follow up as needed
- Recommend revisions that improve clarity and rigor
- Escalate ethical concerns to the editorial office
- Promote consistent reporting standards
- Encourage data transparency and reproducibility
- Support constructive peer review culture
- Document key decisions for audit trails
Need Editorial Support?
Reach out for guidance on review or policy questions.
