International Journal of Pain Management

International Journal of Pain Management

International Journal of Pain Management – Editors Guidelines

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript

Editors Guidelines

Guidance for editors overseeing pain medicine submissions.

Editorial OversightMaintain rigor and transparency.
Reviewer AlignmentMatch expertise to manuscripts.
Fair DecisionsConsistent, documented decisions.
Clinical ImpactPromote patient focused value.

Journal at a Glance

ISSN: 2688-5328
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2688-5328
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal

Scope Alignment

Acute and chronic pain, neuropathic pain, interventional pain care, rehabilitation, palliative medicine, and translational therapeutics. We prioritize validated clinical and mechanistic evidence.

Publishing Model

Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.

Review Time09 daysFrom submission
Acceptance Rate52%Current average
Decision Time12 daysSubmission to decision
Publication3 daysAfter acceptance
Role of Editors

Editors guide the peer review process and ensure that published research meets IJP standards for methodological rigor and clinical relevance. Editors also help maintain transparency and fairness in manuscript decisions.

Editorial Workflow
1

Initial Assessment

Confirm scope fit and basic compliance.

2

Reviewer Selection

Identify qualified reviewers in pain medicine and clinical care.

3

Decision Making

Evaluate reviews and determine next steps.

4

Author Communication

Provide clear guidance and expectations.

Decision Standards
  • Sound data provenance and ethical compliance
  • Reproducible clinical and analytical methods
  • Clear interpretation of pain related findings
  • Adequate validation and benchmarking
Managing Conflicts and Appeals

Editors must disclose conflicts of interest and recuse themselves when necessary. Appeals are handled transparently and may involve additional editorial review.

Editor Checklist
  • Confirm scope alignment and data availability
  • Check ethical approvals and permits
  • Verify reviewer expertise and balance
  • Ensure decisions are supported by evidence
  • Encourage consistent decision letters and clear revision guidance.
  • Use standardized scoring rubrics for methodological quality.
  • Ensure reviewer expertise matches the manuscript topic.
  • Confirm ethical approvals and patient consent documentation.
  • Monitor turnaround times and communicate delays promptly.
  • Promote data transparency and reproducibility statements.
  • Document conflicts of interest and recuse when needed.
  • Coordinate with guest editors to align on scope fit.
  • Verify clinical trial registration details when applicable.
  • Ensure statistical review for complex models or trials.
  • Request data access statements for sensitive clinical datasets.
  • Encourage clear reporting of diagnostic criteria and staging.
  • Align reviewer feedback with journal policy and scope.
  • Escalate potential integrity concerns to the editorial office.
  • Encourage adherence to CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, or ARRIVE as applicable.
  • Review trial registration details and ensure public registry links.
IJP Commitment

IJP is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in pain medicine and multidisciplinary care. We emphasize reproducible clinical methods, clear reporting of diagnostic criteria, and ethical compliance across all article types.

The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].

We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in pain management research and clinical practice.

Interested in Serving as an Editor?

Join the IJP editorial team to guide high impact pain management research.