Editor Resources

Tools and guidance to support editorial excellence.

• Reviewer selection guidance and expertise matching
• Decision templates and communication tools
• Ethics escalation workflows
• Reporting standard checklists for oncology studies
• Production and copyediting contacts

• Editorial office support via [email protected]
• Updates on policy changes and best practices
• Training resources for new editors
• Access to reviewer performance tracking

Editors have access to decision templates, reviewer guidance, and reporting checklists to support consistent evaluations across colorectal cancer submissions.

• Structured decision letter templates
• Reporting guideline checklists
• Ethics and conflict of interest guidance

The editorial office provides assistance with reviewer invitations, reminders, and production coordination. Contact [email protected] for workflow support.

Resources help editors maintain consistency in scope assessment, methodological evaluation, and clinical impact statements.

Structured workflows help editors manage submissions efficiently, track reviewer responses, and issue consistent decisions.

• Checklists for initial screening
• Reviewer invitation templates
• Decision letter guidance

Editors receive updates on reporting standards and emerging issues in colorectal oncology publishing.

Templates and workflows help editors manage reviews and communication efficiently. These resources standardize expectations for colorectal cancer manuscripts.

• Manuscript screening checklist
• Reviewer reminder templates
• Decision letter examples

Editors can rely on structured tools to deliver consistent decisions.

• Standardized reviewer invitation templates
• Decision letter examples for major revisions
• Reporting checklists for clinical studies
• Guidance on ethics and conflicts
• Support for reviewer reminders

Editors can reach the office for workflow and policy support.

• Dedicated contact for reviewer follow up
• Guidance on handling ethics questions
• Assistance with special issue coordination
• Access to updated templates
• Technical support for submission systems

Resources help manage reviews with clarity and speed.

• Guidance on managing late reviews
• Templates for revision requests
• Examples of scope fit assessments
• Best practices for reviewer feedback

Resources help editors deliver consistent decisions.

• Access checklists for clinical trial reporting
• Use decision letter samples for clarity
• Review sample scope fit statements
• Apply guidance on handling conflicts

Short references help during fast screening cycles.

• Scope fit prompts for desk review
• Templates for revision requests
• Checklists for ethics verification

Small tools help keep decisions consistent.

• Use scope fit prompts during screening
• Apply standardized ethics checks

Consistent use of templates and checklists improves turnaround times and helps editors deliver clear, fair decisions.

Quick reference tools reduce screening time and help maintain consistency across decisions.