Editor Resources
Guidance and tools for editors managing immunization submissions.
Journal at a Glance
ISSN: 2577-137X
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2577-137X
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal
Scope Alignment
Immunization policy, vaccine development, safety monitoring, immunogenicity, delivery systems, and global vaccine equity. We prioritize evidence that strengthens public health outcomes and informs immunization programs.
Publishing Model
Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.
JI provides tools and guidance to help editors manage immunization submissions efficiently.
Resources focus on standardized review workflows, ethical compliance, and reporting quality.
Editors can access reference materials that support consistent decision making and evidence appraisal across vaccine science topics.
Review Templates
Standardized decision letters and reviewer forms.
Reporting Checklists
CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, and CARE guidance.
Ethics Guidance
COPE workflows and participant privacy safeguards.
Data Standards
Expectations for registry and surveillance datasets.
- Confirm scope fit and immunization relevance early
- Match reviewers to vaccine, epidemiology, or policy expertise
- Verify ethics approvals and consent documentation
- Request clarity on vaccination schedules and outcomes
- Monitor review timelines and follow up promptly
The editorial office provides assistance for complex submissions, including guidance on data transparency or conflict resolution. Editors can request additional reviewers or policy experts when needed.
Editors receive access to reporting guidance, ethics resources, and immunization terminology references. These materials help standardize decisions and maintain consistent expectations across submissions.
Updates are shared when reporting standards change.
Guidance includes links to key reporting frameworks.
Reference lists help verify policy terminology.
Resources include examples of strong immunization manuscripts.
Reference materials support consistent evaluations.
Resources are refreshed regularly.
Decision templates and reviewer invitation language are available to streamline communication. These tools help editors maintain clarity and consistency across the review process.
Templates can be customized to fit specific immunization topics.
Workflow tools also support consistent documentation of decisions.
Standard prompts help ensure key policy implications are addressed.
Tools are refreshed as journal policies evolve.
Tools reduce administrative burden.
Efficient tools support faster decisions.
Tools help maintain quality.
JI is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in immunization research and program evaluation. We emphasize reproducible methods, clear reporting of vaccine outcomes, and ethical compliance across all article types.
The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].
We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in vaccine science, safety monitoring, and public health impact.
Need Editorial Support?
Contact the editorial office for resources or workflow guidance.
