Resources for IIIJ Editors
IIIJ provides editors with tools that support efficient decision making and consistent standards. These resources help editors evaluate submissions across laboratory, clinical, and computational domains.
In Vitro
Protocol and reporting checklists
In Vivo
Ethics and ARRIVE guidance
In Silico
Data and model evaluation tools
Core Editorial Tools
Policy References
Integrity Standards- Editorial policies and ethics guidance
- Conflict of interest procedures
- Correction and retraction workflows
Decision Templates
Consistent Communication- Decision letter templates
- Reviewer invitation guidance
- Revision checklists
Quality Checks
Method Review- Method reporting checklists
- Data availability verification
- Model and code transparency cues
Editorial Support
The editorial office assists with reviewer selection, policy clarification, and complex ethical cases. Contact [email protected] for guidance.
Workflow Training
New editors receive onboarding materials and periodic updates. Resources can be shared on request to support consistent decision making.
Frequently Used Resources
Escalation Pathways
If an editor identifies possible misconduct or ethical concerns, the editorial office provides guidance on investigations and documentation. Escalation ensures consistent handling across submissions.
Reviewer Development
Editors are encouraged to recommend new reviewers to diversify expertise across the three research domains. This improves coverage and helps maintain timely reviews.
Best Practice Briefings
Periodic briefings summarize policy updates, reporting standards, and common ethical issues. These updates help editors remain consistent when handling manuscripts across diverse methodologies. Briefings also include reviewer management tips.
Decision Quality Review
Editors can request feedback on complex decisions or borderline cases. Collaborative review improves consistency and protects the integrity of the journal record. Peer input is available when needed.
Resource Requests
If you need a new checklist or template for a specialized method, request it from the editorial office. We can tailor resources to specific laboratory or computational workflows. Feedback from editors helps improve future guidance and resource quality.
Strong editorial resources help maintain quality and speed. IIIJ supports editors with tools that align with our integrative mission.
Need an Editorial Resource?
Email [email protected] and we will provide the templates or guidance you need. We welcome suggestions for additional resources and respond promptly. Resource updates are shared regularly, and new tools are added periodically. Monthly updates go to editors, and resources are free. Help is available whenever you need guidance. Resources can be tailored to your workflow and issue timelines.
