Editorial Guidelines for IIIJ
Editors ensure that IIIJ publishes rigorous, ethical, and methodologically sound research across in vitro, in vivo, and in silico domains. These guidelines outline expectations for screening, reviewer selection, and decision making.
In Vitro
Check methods, controls, and reproducibility
In Vivo
Confirm ethics, ARRIVE, and clinical rigor
In Silico
Assess data and model transparency
Editor Duties at a Glance
Initial Screening
Scope and Compliance- Confirm scope alignment and completeness
- Identify ethics or reporting gaps
- Assess baseline methodological rigor
Reviewer Selection
Expert Match- Select qualified, unbiased reviewers
- Balance laboratory, clinical, and computational input
- Manage timelines and responsiveness
Decision Guidance
Clear Outcomes- Provide clear, evidence based decisions
- Encourage constructive revisions
- Uphold integrity and confidentiality
Communication
Editors should provide clear guidance to authors and reviewers, explain decisions when needed, and escalate ethical concerns to the editorial office.
Support and Escalation
For complex cases, contact [email protected]. The editorial office provides policy guidance and helps maintain consistent decisions.
Key Considerations
Confidentiality
All manuscripts and reviews are confidential. Editors must not share submissions or use unpublished data for personal research. Confidentiality protects authors and the integrity of the review process.
Timeliness
Timely editorial handling keeps authors informed and improves the publishing experience. If delays occur, notify the editorial office and update reviewers and authors when appropriate.
Handling Conflicts
Editors must recuse themselves when a conflict of interest exists. Conflicts include close collaborations, institutional ties, or financial relationships that could bias decisions.
Decision Documentation
Keep clear notes on decision rationale, reviewer input, and key concerns. Documentation supports transparency and helps the editorial office address any appeals or queries.
Ethical Oversight
When ethical issues arise, editors should pause the review and seek guidance. This includes concerns about consent, animal welfare, or data manipulation. Early escalation protects the integrity of the journal.
Editors protect the scientific record. Thoughtful decisions and clear communication keep the review process fair and effective.
Need Editorial Guidance?
Email [email protected] for policy support or workflow questions. We aim to respond quickly to keep reviews on schedule. Guidance is available for complex cases, including ethics or conflict issues. Editors are encouraged to ask early and communicate often. Your leadership is appreciated and valued consistently. Our team is here to support you.
