Editor Guidelines
Standards and expectations for JN Editorial Board members.
Leadership in Cancer Science Publishing
Editors are the custodians of scientific quality. Your oncology expertise and judgment shape the journal's direction and ensure only rigorous, impactful cancer research reaches the community.
Manuscript Assessment
Evaluate submissions for scientific merit, clinical relevance, methodological rigor, and contribution to oncology. Determine scope fit before initiating review.
Reviewer Selection
Identify qualified oncologists and cancer researchers without conflicts of interest. Balance clinical and basic science perspectives for comprehensive evaluation.
Decision Authority
Make accept, revise, or reject decisions based on reviewer reports and independent oncology judgment. Provide clear, constructive feedback to authors.
Timeline Management
Maintain efficient processing. Cancer researchers value rapid publication—ensure timely reviewer invitations and decision communication.
- Treat all manuscripts as confidential documents
- Recuse from manuscripts with pharmaceutical or personal conflicts
- Avoid using unpublished oncology findings from submissions
- Report suspected misconduct or data fabrication to Editor-in-Chief
- Apply consistent standards regardless of author institution or reputation
Questions About Editorial Duties?
Contact the Editor-in-Chief for guidance.
