Reviewer Resources
Tools and guidance for reviewers assessing thyroid cancer manuscripts.
Journal at a Glance
ISSN: 2574-4496
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2574-4496
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal
Scope Alignment
Thyroid carcinoma, endocrine oncology, surgical and medical management, molecular diagnostics, and survivorship care. We prioritize evidence that improves diagnosis and outcomes.
Publishing Model
Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.
JTC provides resources to help reviewers deliver thorough, fair, and timely evaluations of thyroid cancer manuscripts.
Review Templates
Structured prompts for consistent evaluations.
Reporting Checklists
CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA guidance.
Ethics Guidance
Patient privacy and consent expectations.
Data Standards
Imaging and molecular transparency expectations.
- Assess diagnostic criteria and staging accuracy
- Check clarity of treatment protocols
- Evaluate confounder control and bias mitigation
- Review data availability statements
- Provide constructive, prioritized feedback
- Assess clarity of diagnostic criteria and staging definitions.
- Verify methodological rigor and appropriate statistical analysis.
- Check adherence to reporting guidelines such as CONSORT or STROBE.
- Comment on clinical relevance and translational impact.
- Review data availability and reproducibility statements.
- Confirm ethics approvals and patient consent disclosures.
- Provide constructive feedback and prioritize major issues.
- Assess whether confounders and biases are addressed.
- Evaluate imaging or pathology reporting completeness.
- Recommend clarifications for cohort selection or outcomes.
- Check consistency between tables, figures, and text.
- Evaluate whether conclusions overstate clinical implications.
- Suggest improvements to data presentation and figure clarity.
- Assess whether intervention descriptions are sufficient for replication.
- Assess clarity of RAI dosing and response assessments.
- Check completeness of surgical technique descriptions.
- Evaluate reporting of recurrence definitions and surveillance intervals.
- Review adequacy of molecular testing methods and validation.
- Confirm consistency between pathology findings and conclusions.
- Assess relevance of outcomes to guideline recommendations.
- Recommend clarifications on biomarker interpretation.
- Comment on patient reported outcome reporting when present.
- Assess adequacy of follow up duration for recurrence outcomes.
Where can I access templates?
Templates are shared with each review invitation.
Can I request additional guidance?
Yes. Email [email protected] for support.
Are training materials available?
Yes. Ask the editorial office for reviewer training resources.
JTC is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in thyroid cancer research and care. We emphasize reproducible clinical methods, clear reporting of diagnostic criteria, and ethical compliance across all article types.
The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].
We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in endocrine oncology, surgical outcomes, and translational thyroid research.
Need Review Support?
Contact the editorial office for reviewer resources and assistance.