Journal of Cervical Cancer

Journal of Cervical Cancer

Journal of Cervical Cancer – Editor Resources

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript

Editor Resources

Tools and guidance for consistent editorial decisions.

Editorial Resources

Support that strengthens peer review quality.

Publishing Standards

Open Access Reach

All articles are immediately available worldwide, supporting clinicians, researchers, and public health teams.

Rigorous Review

Single blind peer review with editorial oversight ensures methodological and ethical integrity.

DOI and Metadata

Structured metadata and DOI registration improve discoverability across scholarly platforms.

Ethics First

We prioritize patient consent, data transparency, and adherence to international research guidelines.

Reviewer Tools

Editors have access to reviewer selection tools and guidance to match expertise with manuscript needs.

Decision Support

Decision templates and evaluation criteria help maintain consistency across reviews and improve transparency for authors.

Policy Updates

Regular updates summarize ethics policies, data transparency requirements, and publishing standards.

Training

Editorial training sessions cover best practices for peer review, conflict management, and quality assurance.

Additional Context

Editors receive guidance on reviewer selection, conflict management, and decision templates to support consistent and transparent review outcomes.

Training resources cover ethical issues, data transparency, and handling of clinical trial submissions to maintain journal integrity.

Updated policy summaries help editors align decisions with evolving standards in cervical cancer research and clinical care.

Support from the editorial office is available for complex cases, appeals, or methodological concerns.

Cervical cancer research benefits from clear reporting of population characteristics, including age distribution, screening history, and vaccination status. This context helps readers interpret generalizability and informs policy decisions.

When describing interventions, explain how they align with clinical guidelines or public health recommendations. Contextualizing findings supports translation into care pathways.

Transparent reporting of funding sources and resource constraints helps readers assess feasibility in different settings. This is critical for global health adoption.

Where possible, include discussion of equity impacts and strategies to reduce disparities in screening or treatment access.

High quality visual summaries and clear tables improve uptake by clinicians and program managers. Provide succinct interpretations for key outputs.

Consider including patient engagement or community involvement approaches when they inform program design or trial recruitment.

Explain how results compare with prior evidence and identify remaining knowledge gaps for future cervical cancer research.

JCC Commitment

Journal of Cervical Cancer is dedicated to advancing cervical cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment through transparent publishing.

Our editorial office supports authors, reviewers, and readers with clear guidance and responsive communication. Contact [email protected] for scope or workflow questions.

Access Editor Resources

Stay informed and supported throughout the editorial process.