Reviewer Resources
Tools to guide fair and effective peer review.
Reviewer Support Resources
Ensure reviews are rigorous, fair, and constructive.
Publishing Standards
Open Access Reach
All articles are immediately available worldwide, supporting clinicians, researchers, and public health teams.
Rigorous Review
Single blind peer review with editorial oversight ensures methodological and ethical integrity.
DOI and Metadata
Structured metadata and DOI registration improve discoverability across scholarly platforms.
Ethics First
We prioritize patient consent, data transparency, and adherence to international research guidelines.
Review Checklist
Use this short guide to structure your review and maintain consistency.
- Confirm scope alignment with cervical cancer topics
- Assess methods, data quality, and transparency
- Review ethics and consent statements
- Evaluate clarity of results and conclusions
Bias and Ethics
Avoid conflicts of interest and report any potential bias. Treat manuscripts with confidentiality and respect.
Reporting Tips
Provide actionable feedback and highlight both strengths and areas for improvement. Reference evidence when possible.
Support
For review support or questions, contact [email protected].
Additional Context
Resources include guidance on evaluating study design, ethics reporting, and clinical relevance. Templates help structure consistent feedback.
Reviewers are encouraged to reference reporting standards and note missing methodological details that affect interpretation.
For complex clinical trials, request additional statistical or methodological review when needed.
Contact the editorial office for support with scope questions or to report potential conflicts of interest.
Cervical cancer research benefits from clear reporting of population characteristics, including age distribution, screening history, and vaccination status. This context helps readers interpret generalizability and informs policy decisions.
When describing interventions, explain how they align with clinical guidelines or public health recommendations. Contextualizing findings supports translation into care pathways.
Transparent reporting of funding sources and resource constraints helps readers assess feasibility in different settings. This is critical for global health adoption.
Where possible, include discussion of equity impacts and strategies to reduce disparities in screening or treatment access.
High quality visual summaries and clear tables improve uptake by clinicians and program managers. Provide succinct interpretations for key outputs.
Consider including patient engagement or community involvement approaches when they inform program design or trial recruitment.
JCC Commitment
Journal of Cervical Cancer is dedicated to advancing cervical cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment through transparent publishing.
Our editorial office supports authors, reviewers, and readers with clear guidance and responsive communication. Contact [email protected] for scope or workflow questions.
Access Reviewer Resources
Consistent reviews improve cervical cancer research quality.
