JCC maintains editorial independence to ensure objective decisions based on scientific merit and ethical integrity.

Editors evaluate manuscripts without influence from sponsors or commercial interests.

The journal uses single blind peer review supported by editorial oversight. Reviewers assess methodological rigor, clinical relevance, and reporting transparency.

Decisions are guided by clear criteria and documented feedback to support author improvement.

We follow international publication ethics standards. Allegations of plagiarism, data fabrication, or improper authorship are investigated promptly.

Authors must disclose conflicts of interest and funding sources.

Authorship should reflect substantial contributions to study design, data analysis, or manuscript preparation. Contribution statements clarify roles.

If errors are identified, the journal issues corrections or retractions as needed to maintain the integrity of the scholarly record.

Authors are expected to cooperate with post publication reviews and updates.

Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose relationships that could influence decision making. Transparent disclosure protects trust in cervical cancer research.

Editorial decisions are based on scientific merit and relevance to cervical cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. The journal does not allow commercial influence on editorial outcomes.

We follow international guidelines for publication ethics and encourage adherence to COPE standards. Suspected misconduct is investigated transparently and documented.

Authors must disclose conflicts of interest, funding sources, and any relevant affiliations. Transparency protects trust in clinical research.

Appeals or disputes are handled through a documented process that includes editorial review and, when needed, external consultation.

Corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern may be issued when errors or ethical issues are identified. The journal prioritizes the integrity of the record.

Reviewer confidentiality is protected, and reviewer identities are not disclosed to authors. Editors ensure constructive and respectful communication.

Data availability expectations are communicated at submission and reinforced during review. Authors should be prepared to provide supporting materials when requested.

Policies are reviewed periodically to align with evolving clinical standards, funder mandates, and best practices in open access publishing.

Appeals should include specific methodological clarifications or evidence based responses to reviewer comments. The editorial office reviews appeals promptly and communicates outcomes with transparency.

Complaints about editorial conduct are reviewed internally with documented outcomes to ensure accountability and continuous improvement.

Cervical cancer research benefits from clear reporting of population characteristics, including age distribution, screening history, and vaccination status. This context helps readers interpret generalizability and informs policy decisions.

When describing interventions, explain how they align with clinical guidelines or public health recommendations. Contextualizing findings supports translation into care pathways.

Transparent reporting of funding sources and resource constraints helps readers assess feasibility in different settings. This is critical for global health adoption.

Where possible, include discussion of equity impacts and strategies to reduce disparities in screening or treatment access.

High quality visual summaries and clear tables improve uptake by clinicians and program managers. Provide succinct interpretations for key outputs.

Consider including patient engagement or community involvement approaches when they inform program design or trial recruitment.

Explain how results compare with prior evidence and identify remaining knowledge gaps for future cervical cancer research.

Ensure terminology is consistent and define acronyms on first use to improve clarity for interdisciplinary audiences.

Discuss potential implications for implementation in low and middle income settings where cervical cancer burden remains high.

The editorial office can advise on scope fit and reporting expectations before submission at [email protected].

Journal of Cervical Cancer is dedicated to advancing cervical cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment through transparent publishing.

Our editorial office supports authors, reviewers, and readers with clear guidance and responsive communication. Contact [email protected] for scope or workflow questions.