Confirm that your manuscript aligns with the special issue theme and meets submission deadlines. Indicate the special issue title in your cover letter.

Submit all required files including ethics documentation and data statements.

Provide the complete manuscript, figures, and any supplementary materials. Include a short statement on how the work fits the special issue focus.

Guest editors and the journal editorial team manage peer review. Decisions follow the same quality standards as regular articles.

Authors may be asked to revise for clarity, methodological rigor, or clinical relevance.

Ensure all ethical approvals, consent procedures, and trial registrations are provided in the manuscript.

Disclose conflicts of interest and funding sources clearly.

For special issue submission questions, contact [email protected].

Ensure your cover letter clearly names the special issue theme and describes how the manuscript aligns with the collection goals. This helps route the submission to the correct editors.

Submit complete files at the initial stage, including figures, tables, and any required ethics or trial documentation to avoid review delays.

Special issue submissions follow the same peer review standards as regular articles, including methodological rigor and transparency expectations.

If you anticipate delays or need clarification on scope, contact the editorial office early to keep the submission timeline on track.

Cervical cancer research benefits from clear reporting of population characteristics, including age distribution, screening history, and vaccination status. This context helps readers interpret generalizability and informs policy decisions.

When describing interventions, explain how they align with clinical guidelines or public health recommendations. Contextualizing findings supports translation into care pathways.

Transparent reporting of funding sources and resource constraints helps readers assess feasibility in different settings. This is critical for global health adoption.

Where possible, include discussion of equity impacts and strategies to reduce disparities in screening or treatment access.

High quality visual summaries and clear tables improve uptake by clinicians and program managers. Provide succinct interpretations for key outputs.

Consider including patient engagement or community involvement approaches when they inform program design or trial recruitment.

Explain how results compare with prior evidence and identify remaining knowledge gaps for future cervical cancer research.

Journal of Cervical Cancer is dedicated to advancing cervical cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment through transparent publishing.

Our editorial office supports authors, reviewers, and readers with clear guidance and responsive communication. Contact [email protected] for scope or workflow questions.