Reviewer Guidelines
Standards for rigorous and constructive peer review in parasitology.
The Foundation of Parasitology Quality
Peer review is the cornerstone of credible parasitology research. Your expert evaluation ensures published work meets standards of scientific validity and global health relevance.
Timeliness
Complete reviews within 14 days. Parasitology research often impacts disease control—notify editors promptly if unable to meet deadlines.
Objectivity
Evaluate manuscripts based solely on scientific merit. Provide evidence-based critique without personal or institutional bias.
Confidentiality
Treat manuscripts as confidential. Never share findings, discuss content, or use ideas without author permission.
Constructiveness
Offer actionable suggestions for improvement. Even for rejections, provide feedback helping authors strengthen research.
- Summary: Brief overview of the study and parasitology contribution
- Major Comments: Methodological concerns, validity issues, fundamental flaws
- Minor Comments: Clarity, statistical refinements, figure improvements
- Recommendation: Accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject
Questions About Reviewing?
Contact the editorial office for guidance.
